Miscellaneous ramblings of NarcKiddo

Started by NarcKiddo, June 20, 2023, 04:09:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Hope67

Hi NarcKiddo,
I felt really angry about hearing that your M tried to burn your finger when you were a child, using that gas tap, to supposedly teach you a lesson - she was literally monstrous to do that.  I really wanted to say that.  I hope you don't mind my expressing my anger about it, but I do feel angry.  (I hope my anger isn't triggering). 

Anyway, you mentioned that you feel generally better about things (at least on 14th June) and I hope you are okay.   

 :hug:

NarcKiddo

Thank you ZR and Hope

Quote from: Hope67 on June 15, 2026, 05:27:15 PMI really wanted to say that.  I hope you don't mind my expressing my anger about it, but I do feel angry.  (I hope my anger isn't triggering). 

Thank you for being so caring in connection with anger, Hope. I know I've posted in the past about problems with anger, since my M was such a ball of rage and fury most of the time, and nobody else was allowed to have anger at all. My H tends to have outbursts about minor things, plus a bit of road rage from time to time, and that affects me very badly. So it was interesting to me to see my own reaction to your comment, and then to your acknowledgement that I might be triggered by it.

I wasn't at all triggered by it. In fact it was really helpful to see someone's measured response to what was, indeed, a monstrous thing to do to anyone, let alone a primary school age child. It is good for me to see that anger is a valid emotion in certain circumstances. It is right to feel angry about what my M did. It is good for me to be in a situation where anger has been generated over a situation I was involved in and yet to know with certainty that it wasn't my fault, and the anger is not directed at me, nor will it spill over onto me. In fact you took care to say that you hoped I wouldn't mind. This is a really good example of why interacting on this site is so therapeutic.

 :hug:

..................

I've been ridiculously worked up over one aspect of something my S said in a message. She listed domestic chores I can no longer do (in her opinion) due to my lung condition and said she assumed I have a cleaner to do that. It was framed as a question, though, and thus more like a requirement. You had better have a cleaner, or else. That's how the Littles took it, at any rate, and got really worked up. I don't need a cleaner and I don't have one. I don't want one, for all sorts of reasons. In any case, domestic tasks are actually good for me because they involve a certain amount of physical work but can easily be paced or done in chunks.

The Littles became terrified about having to say we don't have a cleaner and what the fallout from that might be. I chose simply to ignore the part about the cleaner when I replied about some other points raised in the message. Which was on family chat so M will have seen it. This was a couple of days ago so I thought I'd got away with it.

Then yesterday M sent a message on family chat about cleaners. She thought it looked oh-so-casual. Telling me about her new cleaner and then asking me about mine, with an apparently breezy assumption that I have one. Wanting to know how often she came and was she good. I made some comment about being glad she was pleased with her new cleaner and again ignored the questions about mine. The Littles became terrified again. M had already made offers in her gooey messages to pay for transport that I don't want or need and the Littles were terrified that if I tell her I don't have a cleaner she will insist on paying for one. I did my best to tell them that I can and will refuse a cleaner just as I refused her offer of help with transport costs. All these are things I can perfectly well afford if I want them and M knows this. But M has a habit of throwing money at problems she perceives, and providing money for things means she is entitled to ask about them and have contact for the purpose. I slept badly last night over this issue. It's so minor, and yet it's so huge.

Today I got a message from S asking about a safe subject (in her view) which may have been a prelude to asking about the cleaner business. I don't know. That's what the Littles thought, anyway. Then I saw I had missed a call from M and the Littles became even more convinced M wanted to know about the cleaner. So far I have simply been dodging a question I don't believe is their business, but if I get asked directly to my face I will say I do not have and do not want a cleaner and then deal with any fallout. The Littles were not happy but I rang M and we had a very stilted conversation. She made no mention of cleaners. Nor did I. Then I dealt with the message from S and so far nothing has been said about cleaners by her either.

In hindsight what I probably should have done when S first raised the issue was simply to say I don't have a cleaner and leave it at that. I didn't really want to answer her question because I felt it intrusive and also because it made me angry. The reason for that is that it's yet another example of FOO never asking what I want or need, and not listening to anything I say. They just make assumptions and dictate their view of the world. If I hold a different view I am the awkward one. I have made it clear since 2011 that lung issues need more exercise than less and, frankly, very few medical issues are improved by lying back on a bed with a hand to my forehead like some tragic heroine. But they have not heard me because they do not care to listen. It does not fit their world view.